Skip to main content

Video Claims To Show Price Discrepancies Of Up To 78% At L.A. Zara Store

Last week, a Zara customer filed a lawsuit against the company accusing it of misleading customers by posting some prices in euros and others in U.S. dollars, and of making up its own exchange rates to charge more for those items with price tags in dollars. The plaintiff’s lawyers now say they have even more proof of this pricing switcheroo.

The attorneys at Geragos & Geragos posted a video on YouTube (careful: you’ll want to turn the sound down unless obnoxious music is your thing) of a visit to a Zara store in downtown Los Angeles that they say shows the company is ripping off customers with its pricing tacts.

“Since Zara apparently thinks American consumers are stupid, we decided to take the #ZaraChallenge and see how much we would be ripped off in 10 minutes of shopping,” the caption reads.

In the video, they show price tags for individual items, both in euros and in U.S. dollars, and then a calculated “ripoff” amount. In one example, the price on the tag for a pair of black shoes is €39.99, which as of today Google’s currency converter says works out to about $45. So the $79.99 listed price on another tag for the same pair of shoes means Zara is charging $35 more than the euro price on the first tag, for a “ripoff” difference of 78%.

On another comparison, the camera shows a price tag of €29.95 on a navy cardigan, with another of the same sweater priced at $49.90, for a total discrepancy of about $16, or 48%, as the item should actually be about $33. All told, the lawyers claim that that shopping trip would’ve resulted in a total ripoff of more than $175, or 55%.

Might Zara simply be charging more for items sold in the U.S.? Perhaps, but the lawsuit claims that by including prices in both euros and dollars on the same items, consumers are confused into thinking they’ll pay slightly more in U.S. dollars, when in reality they shell out much more than the euro price would indicate.

“[T]he conversion rate is entirely misapplied — to the extent it is even applied at all — such that U.S. consumers are paying far more than the true prices of the products,” the complaint says. Furthermore, Zara’s practice of using euro pricing confuses customers “and lures them to the register,” where they are charged inflated prices that aren’t based on real exchange rates, according to the lawsuit.

Last week Zara called the lawsuit’s claims “baseless,” and said it prides itself in its “fundamental commitment to transparency and honest, ethical conduct with” its “valued customers.”

“We look forward to presenting our full defense in due course through the legal process,” the company said.

We’ve reached out to Zara US for comment on the video’s claims and will update this post if we hear back.


by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chrysler Deletes Its Dating Apps, Decides To Remain Single For Now

They say you can’t have a healthy relationship until you’re happy with yourself. That appears to be the new mantra for Fiat Chrysler: After several attempts to woo General Motors and more recently Volkswagen , the carmaker’s top executive says he plans to ditch his lovelorn ways to concentrate on his company’s bottom line.  Bloomberg reports that CEO Sergio Marchionne has turned his focus to eliminating FCA’s debt rather than eliminating its single status. Marchionne has set a goal of erasing FCA’s debt by 2019, the same year he’s set to retire. To do that, he says the company needs to do a little work on itself. “We need to be very careful that we don’t start unrealistic dreams about consolidation as we are on our way to achieve historically important results and a debt-free position,” Marchionne told investors at the carmaker’s annual meeting in Amsterdam, as reported by Bloomberg. “We are not at a point of time to discuss any alliance.” Yes, you heard that right: The man w...

Study Claims 43% Of “Wild” Salmon In Stores & Restaurants Isn’t Wild At All

That wild salmon entrée calling to you from the menu at dinner might not be all it’s advertised. In fact a new study released Wednesday found evidence of mislabeling in nearly half of all salmon sold in restaurants and grocery stores.  The study [ PDF ] from international environmental advocacy group, Oceana, analyzed 82 salmon samples from restaurants and grocery stores, finding that 43% of the products were mislabeled. DNA testing confirmed that 69% of the mislabeled product consisted of farmed Atlantic salmon being sold as wild-caught product. According to the report, consumers satisfying their salmon craving in restaurants are misled about 67% of the time, while those who buy their seafood in a grocery store are misled 20% of the time. “Americans might love salmon, but as our study reveals, they may be falling victim to a bait and switch,” Beth Lowell, senior campaign director at Oceana, said . “When consumers opt for wild-caught U.S. salmon, they don’t expect to get a far...

Introduction to Biology (IX Biology Notes Chapter 01)

Science: Our universe operates under certain principles. For understanding of these principles, the experiments are done and observations are made; on the basis of which logical conclusions are drawn. Such a study is called "Science". In brief science is the knowledge based on experiments and observations. Biology: The Scientific study of living organisms is called Biology. The word biology is derived from two Greek words "bios" meaning life and "logos" meaning thought, discourse, reasoning or study. It means that all aspects of life and every type of living organism are discussed in biology. Branches of Biology: Biology is divided into following branches: Morphology The study of form and structure of living organisms is called morphology. It can be further divided into following two parts: 1. The study of external parts of living organism is called external morphology. 2. The study of internal parts of living organism is calle...